Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: problem with negative binomial fixed effect model


From   Nahla Betelmal <[email protected]>
To   "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject   st: problem with negative binomial fixed effect model
Date   Mon, 10 Mar 2014 22:39:49 +0000

Dear Statalist,

I want to apply fixed effect negative binomial model on my panel data.
the panel variable is firm and I  control for year effect by year
indicator variable as follow:

xtnbreg dependent-variable independent-variables i.year, fe

However, I found this paper by Paul D. Allison and Richard Waterman,
"FIXED-EFFECTS NEGATIVE BINOMIAL REGRESSION MODELS " which argues that
the above command does not actually produce the correct fixed-effect
negative binomial model.

http://www.ssc.upenn.edu/~allison/FENB.pdf

Instead the authors present the case to include indicator variable
(dummy variable) to get the fixed-effect estimates, so the command
should be as follow

nbreg dependent-variable independent-variables i.year i.firm


In my case there is a problem in using this command as I have large
number of firms, 1,200 firms for years from 1993-2010. I got the error

matsize too small, r(908);

Is there a way in Stata to get the correct fixed-effect estimates as
suggested by the above authors ? I have 12.1 version, MP edition

Thank you for all the help

Best Regards

Nahla Betelmal
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index