Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: RE: RE: RE: st: Pearson/Spearman Correlation Matrix
From
"Abdalla, Ahmed" <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: RE: RE: RE: st: Pearson/Spearman Correlation Matrix
Date
Sun, 12 Jan 2014 20:36:31 +0000
Red,
I understand this now, I would replace the .0000 I get with 0.0001 as the significance level for related correlation coefficients, right?
Thanks
________________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Red Owl <[email protected]>
Sent: 12 January 2014 20:09
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: st: Pearson/Spearman Correlation Matrix
Ahmed,
If Stata outputs a p-value = .0000, you would report p < .0001, so the
significance level of the correlation coefficient would be .0001.
Red Owl
redowl.liu.edu
>Thanks Red, I didn't know the source!
>I have done that exactly, but is the significance level of the
>correlation coefficients (0.05) ?
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/