Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
"Abdalla, Ahmed" <[email protected]> |

To |
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> |

Subject |
RE: RE: RE: RE: st: Pearson/Spearman Correlation Matrix |

Date |
Sun, 12 Jan 2014 20:34:48 +0000 |

Thanks Daniel. I have upgraded your program. To get the Pearson/Spearman correlation matrix for X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 , I write: corsp X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 [,pvalues] but it doesn't work...I am sorry but I am new to Stata and not experienced with programming...I think I may use a wrong syntax for my variables.... Sorry for being a pain, but can you kindly show my the exact code for my variables after installing the program ? Thanks ________________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Red Owl <[email protected]> Sent: 12 January 2014 20:09 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: st: Pearson/Spearman Correlation Matrix Ahmed, If Stata outputs a p-value = .0000, you would report p < .0001, so the significance level of the correlation coefficient would be .0001. Red Owl redowl.liu.edu >Thanks Red, I didn't know the source! >I have done that exactly, but is the significance level of the >correlation coefficients (0.05) ? * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:

- Prev by Date:
**RE: RE: RE: RE: st: Pearson/Spearman Correlation Matrix** - Next by Date:
**RE: RE: RE: RE: st: Pearson/Spearman Correlation Matrix** - Previous by thread:
**RE: RE: RE: RE: st: Pearson/Spearman Correlation Matrix** - Next by thread:
**RE: RE: RE: RE: st: Pearson/Spearman Correlation Matrix** - Index(es):