Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: FW: GMM system autocorrelation and Hansen test


From   alfredo jimenez palmero <[email protected]>
To   "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject   st: FW: GMM system autocorrelation and Hansen test
Date   Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:15:25 +0000

Dear Statalist users, 

yesteday I made a mistake in my message, my p-avalue is not 0.96 but 0.096 (that is why is significant at the 10% level). This was the original post:


Dear Statalist users, 

I am trying to run a GMM system estimation and I have a couple of 
questions: 

1) My Arellano-Bond AR(2) p-value is 0.96. As far as I know this 
test shows whether there is autocorrelation and it should not be 
significant. Since the test is significant (at the 10% level), any idea 
what I can do to try to fix it? 

2) How can I interpret Hansen test? Should it be significant or 
not? 

Thanks in advance 

Alfredo




----------------------------------------
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: GMM system autocorrelation and Hansen test
> Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 16:23:13 +0000
>
> Dear Statalist users,
>
> I am trying to run a GMM system estimation and I have a couple of questions:
>
> 1) My Arellano-Bond AR(2) p-value is 0.96. As far as I know this test shows whether there is autocorrelation and it should not be significant. Since the test is significant (at the 10% level), any idea what I can do to try to fix it?
>
> 2) How can I interpret Hansen test? Should it be significant or not?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Alfredo 		 	   		  
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index