Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Jen Zhen <jenzhen99@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | st: -ivreg2- with an interaction again |
Date | Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:10:45 +0100 |
Dear list members, in an earlier post I described an issue I had with an -ivreg2- Regression, where I wanted to use an interaction to test whether the causal effect differed between 2 subsamples. In following earlier posts on this list I did this as follows: --ivreg2 outcome controls ind (endogreg endogreg_ind = z z_ind)-- where ind is the indicator for the subsample (0 for about half, 1 for the other half of the sample). Besides the desired 2nd stage output, this yielded 2 first stage regressions for respectively endogreg and endogreg_ind, each of which is in its first stage regressed on both instruments, the indicator and the set of further controls. The issue I had was that I got R2=0.99 on the second first stage regression. There were ultimately no replies to my post, but meanwhile I figured out that this is because for about half the sample the outcome of the second FS regression is endogreg_ind=endogreg*ind=endogreg*0=0 and for all those also z_ind= z*ind= z*0=0 and, more importantly, ind=0. This results in a huge T Stat for ind and therefore in a huhe R2. Now I'm wondering whether given the above reason this is legitimate or whether it means I should omit the indicator from first and second stage, or (probably not) do only the affected second stage separately? Thanks so much and kind regards, JZ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/