Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
David Greenberg <dg4@nyu.edu> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
st: question about confirmatory factor analysis using the sem command in Stata |

Date |
Wed, 4 Dec 2013 15:15:16 -0500 |

I have a question regarding the example given in the print copy of the User's Manual on Structural Equation Modeling for version 12. On page 94, the manual uses an artificial data set to illustrate CFA for a single-factor measurement model. Using version 13.1, I reproduce the results shown in the manual perfectly. When I then type "sem, standardized" to obtain the standardized solution, the output shows a constant term for each path in the measurement model, say for the path x1 <-- X.Why are constant terns present if this is a solution in which the observed variables are standardized? What is the meaning of the constant terms for the standardized solution? David Greenberg, Sociology Department, New York University * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Is this the right code if I want to compare group 1 vs group 4 in a logistic regression model?** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: describe using (problem with abbrev )** - Previous by thread:
**st: Forecasting GDP Levels when D.GDP was used in SVAR estimation** - Next by thread:
**st: St: modify values in an irf table** - Index(es):