Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: converting string to date
From
Nilay Kumar <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: converting string to date
Date
Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:30:37 -0500
Hi Nick,
Thanks for your detailed response. I will look at your references in the Stata journal. For now this works.
thanks again!
Nilay
On Nov 29, 2013, at 1:10 PM, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've got to suggest, however, that Stata's own idea of weeks, although
> logical in its own way, rarely if ever corresponds to any other idea
> of weeks. Thus -week()- is likely to make your problems worse.
>
> This has often been misunderstood, even to the point that it was
> suggested on this list that Stata's implementation of weeks is broken.
> I'll suppress the reference....
>
> The point is discussed in detail in my pieces in the Stata Journal,
> but a brief summary here may help.
>
> Stata's rules are that
>
> 1. Week 1 of a year always starts on 1 January, regardless.
>
> 2. Other weeks therefore start 7, 14, 21, ... days later.
>
> 3. The last week of the year always has 8 or 9 days, depending on
> whether it is not or it is a leap year. So, there are always 52 weeks
> in a year, no more, no less.
>
> Thus weeks always nest within years.
>
> If this corresponds to what you want, that's fine. Every other system
> I've seen has the idea either that weeks begin on a certain day of the
> week, or that they end ditto (or clearly, both). The difference lies
> in what is emphasised, not otherwise. It follows that weeks can span
> two years at the end of one year and the beginning of the next.
>
>
>
> Nick
> [email protected]
>
>
> On 29 November 2013 17:51, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
>> My mistake: I missed the bit about weeks. Joe Canner has very good
>> advice in his reply.
>>
>> Weeks in my view are best handled by treating them as daily dates 7 days apart.
>>
>> See also, if you have a serious interest in weeks,
>>
>> SJ-12-4 dm0065_1 . . . . . Stata tip 111: More on working with weeks, erratum
>> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N. J. Cox
>> Q4/12 SJ 12(4):765 (no commands)
>> lists previously omitted key reference
>>
>> SJ-12-3 dm0065 . . . . . . . . . . Stata tip 111: More on working with weeks
>> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N. J. Cox
>> Q3/12 SJ 12(3):565--569 (no commands)
>> discusses how to convert data presented in yearly and weekly
>> form to daily dates and how to aggregate such data to months
>> or longer intervals
>>
>> SJ-10-4 dm0052 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stata tip 68: Week assumptions
>> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N. J. Cox
>> Q4/10 SJ 10(4):682--685 (no commands)
>> tip on Stata's solution for weeks and on how to set up
>> your own alternatives given different definitions of the
>> week
>>
>> I'm still proud of the weak "week" pun behind "week assumptions". .
>>
>>
>>
>> Nick
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>> On 29 November 2013 17:47, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> This works fine:
>>>
>>> . di %td date("2004-01-04", "YMD")
>>> 04jan2004
>>>
>>> Note the very simple -- but from many posts on this list seemingly
>>> little known -- technique of trying out a simple example using the
>>> -display- command and a format that checks whether I get the right
>>> answer.
>>>
>>> But your approach also works fine in the examples I tried
>>>
>>> . di %td date("2004-01-04", "20YMD")
>>> 04jan2004
>>> . di %td date("1998-01-04", "20YMD")
>>> 04jan1998
>>>
>>> so why did you say "does not seem to work"? Did you forget to assign a
>>> date format so that what you see is human-readable?
>>>
>>>
>>> Nick
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>> On 29 November 2013 17:15, Nilay Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> I have a dataset where weeks are listed as strings ie. 2004-01-04 - 2004-01-10. How can I convert this entire string to dates?
>>>> I tried gen date1= date(var, “20YMD”) but that does not seem to work for this
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/