Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: XTREG
From
Andrea Rispoli <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: XTREG
Date
Mon, 25 Nov 2013 12:35:01 +0000
Thank you very much
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Alfonso Sanchez-Penalver
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes -regress- is the right command. If you include all the dummy variables for the firms make sure to run it without a constant.
>
> Best,
>
> Alfonso Sanchez-Penalver
>
>> On Nov 25, 2013, at 7:10 AM, Andrea Rispoli <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Statalisters,
>> This is probably a very trivial question but if someone would be so
>> kind to respond and clarify my doubts, I would really appreciate.
>>
>> I am running a regression analysis on a panel dataset (in that I have
>> firms observations across multiple years) with repeated time values
>> (multiple observation for the DV in each year).
>>
>> In order to include fixed effects, I am manually entering dummy
>> variables for each firm.
>> My question is: in this case the right command to use is REG or XTREG?
>> My understanding from previous posts is that I should use REG, but a
>> confirmation would be really appreciated.
>> Thank you very much in advance for your time.
>>
>> Kind Regards
>> *
>> * For searches and help try:
>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/