Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Multinomial Logistic - ordinal variables and Odds Ratios


From   Richard Williams <[email protected]>
To   [email protected], "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject   Re: st: Multinomial Logistic - ordinal variables and Odds Ratios
Date   Thu, 14 Nov 2013 22:45:40 -0500

At 09:33 PM 11/14/2013, Imogen Jones wrote:
Hi Everybody

I was hoping somebody could shed some light on the differences between using an ordinal and nominal variable in multinomial logistic regression in Stata.

I understand the processes are different, but I?m more concerned about the model fitting. My interpretation of Hosmer and Lemeshow (2000) was that there isn?t a reliable test to estimate model fit. Is this still correct?

First off, I am curious as to why you are not using an ordered logit (ologit) model. Have you already determined that the assumptions of such a model are violated with your data.

Second, I am not sure by what you mean when you say "the processes are different." If you use an ordinal DV in an mlogit model you are basically ignoring the ordering of the categories and treating the variable as nominal.

Also, when using an ordinal variable as a dependent variable in multinomial logistic, are there any assumptions specific to this analysis that need to be met or parameter estimates that may vary from binary logistic?

The assumptions will be the same whether the DV is ordinal or categorical with more than 2 categories. Again, the fact that the variable is ordinal is irrelevant since you are ignoring the ordered nature of the data when you use mlogit.

Another question ? Stata only seems to produce a coefficient or relative risk ratio for multinomial logistic. Is there a specific reason why it won?t produce an odds ratio or is it just not a function of Stata? I assumed it was the former since Stata is so comprehensive it probably wouldn?t leave something like that out.

No matter what you call it, you are exponentiating the coefficient, i.e. it is the same mathematical transformation. There was a thread some years ago about why Stata used terms like relative risk ratios when other programs called them odds ratios. I'll see if I can find it.


-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
HOME:   (574)289-5227
EMAIL:  [email protected]
WWW:    http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index