Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: Odd results with -estimates- command
From
DE SOUZA Eric <[email protected]>
To
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: Odd results with -estimates- command
Date
Mon, 4 Nov 2013 20:42:55 +0100
Yes, that works partially in that the results are shown.
But one can no longer specify the order. That can be solved by moving the rows.
Thanks very much.
Eric de Souza
College of Europe
Brugge (Bruges), Belgium
http://www.coleurope.eu
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Pitblado, StataCorp LP
Sent: 04 November 2013 20:28
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: Odd results with -estimates- command
Eric DE SOUZA <[email protected]> using -estimates table- to report a table of common coefficients in -regress-, -logit-, and -probit- model fits but not all the requested coefficients are being reported:
> The output below explains the subject header.
> If bOLS is placed in the last column it does not print If bOLS is
> placed in the first column, the other two do not print.
>
> . use ch13.dta
>
> . reg fishmode lnrelp
>
> . estimates store bOLS
>
> . logit fishmode lnrelp
>
> . estimates store blogit
>
> . probit fishmode lnrelp, nolog
>
> . estimates store bprobit
>
> . estimates table blogit bprobit bOLS, t stats(N ll r2 r2_p) b(%10.4f)
> keep(_cons lnrelp)
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Variable | blogit bprobit bOLS
> -------------+---------------------------------------
> _cons | 2.0531 1.1944
> | 12.15 13.34
> lnrelp | -1.8225 -1.0555
> | -12.61 -13.87
> -------------+---------------------------------------
> N | 630 630 630
> ll | -206.8270 -204.4109 -195.1673
> r2 | 0.4633
> r2_p | 0.4486 0.4550
> -----------------------------------------------------
> legend: b/t
>
> . estimates table bOLS blogit bprobit, t stats(N ll r2 r2_p) b(%10.4f)
> keep(_cons lnrelp)
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Variable | bOLS blogit bprobit
> -------------+---------------------------------------
> _cons | 0.7842
> | 58.21
> lnrelp | -0.2429
> | -23.28
> -------------+---------------------------------------
> N | 630 630 630
> ll | -195.1673 -206.8270 -204.4109
> r2 | 0.4633
> r2_p | 0.4486 0.4550
> -----------------------------------------------------
> legend: b/t
We suspect that the problem is due to -logit- and -probit- attaching an equation name for the coefficients in -e(b)-, but -regress- is not.
A work around is to replace the -keep(_cons turn)- option with -eq(1)-.
--Jeff
[email protected]
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/