Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
| From | Alexander Kihm <alex.kihm@gmail.com> |
| To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
| Subject | st: log-likelihood comparison of logit, loglog and cloglog? |
| Date | Sat, 14 Sep 2013 18:20:46 +0200 |
Dear statalisters, my dependent variable is a proportion and I want to try three different link functions when estimating my models with glm: logit, loglog and cloglog. Since I use the exact same predictors, I was thinking about comparing the models' fit just by the log-likelihood. Is that appropriate? Thank you very much, Alex * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/