Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: "Can Your Results be Replicated?" (Stata error?)
From
Richard Williams <[email protected]>
To
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject
Re: st: "Can Your Results be Replicated?" (Stata error?)
Date
Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:41:09 -0500
At 08:14 AM 9/13/2013, Anders Alexandersson wrote:
I just made this reply on the blog:
"Where is the error in Stata? The authorâ??s so called â??Do-File for
Analyses.txtâ?? is actually not a Stata do file but it does refer to
Stataâ??s user-written command -firthlogit- from SSC. Please provide a
reproducible do-file in Stata.The claim that results and conclusions
were due to an error in Stata is not supported."
See
http://politicalsciencereplication.wordpress.com/2013/09/11/guest-blog-how-to-persuade-journals-to-accept-your-replication-paper/comment-page-1/#comment-653
Even if -firthlogit- did get it wrong, it is a
bit of a stretch to imply that Stata has some
terrible flaw. Stata Corp can hardly be held
responsible for flaws in programs it did not write.
When I first sent a program to SSC, I thought
there might be some sort of exhaustive review
process before it was released to the public. I
got the feeling that wasn't the case when I got a
message less than an hour later saying the
program had been posted. Most user-written
routines are fine but people should realize they
haven't undergone the kind of testing that
official programs have. And even in this case, we
don't have any proof yet that firthlogit did get it wrong.
Anders Alexandersson
[email protected]
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Philip Jones
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I found a link on my Twitter feed this AM, purporting to show how
> Stata "made a mistake" that R did not make:
>
> http://www.r-bloggers.com/can-your-results-be-replicated/
>
> which actually points to:
>
>
http://politicalsciencereplication.wordpress.com/2013/09/11/guest-blog-how-to-persuade-journals-to-accept-your-replication-paper/
>
> I realize that "r-bloggers" is likely not the most bias-free site when
> it comes to reviewing/rating stats packages, but has anyone got an
> idea as to what is actually going on here? Is Stata really at fault?
>
> Regards,
>
> Phil
> @pmgjones on Twitter
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
HOME: (574)289-5227
EMAIL: [email protected]
WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/