Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Lucas <lucaselastic@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: Sampling without replacement? |
Date | Sat, 27 Jul 2013 07:57:07 -0700 |
Hi, How did you obtain the 1,000 heads-of-households? In sampling without replacement you select household 1 (the Smith household), set it aside, then select household 2 (the Jones household), and so on. In sampling with replacement you select household 1 (the Torvald household), note that, put it back in the population, then select household 2 (which could be either the Debian household OR the Torvald household), and so on. Which did you do? That will determine whether you sampled with or without replacement, not who ends up in the sample. It is possible to sample with replacement and still have 1,000 unique households in the sample of 1,000. HTH Sam On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Jessica Boatwright <jbhokie1@vt.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > I want to make sure that my assumption that I sampled without > replacement is correct. I conducted a choice experiment and to collect > my data I sent out a mail questionnaire. I sampled 1,000 > heads-of-households (i.e. I had 1,000 addresses, all of them unique). > Each respondent answered 4 choice questions. Is this still considered > sampling without replacement? > > Let me know if you need any additional information to answer my question. > > Thank you! > Sincerely, > Jessica > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/