Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: random quadratic effect without random linear effect?

From   Maarten Buis <>
Subject   Re: st: random quadratic effect without random linear effect?
Date   Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:36:30 +0200

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Jordan Silberman wrote:
> For a model run in xtmixed, we all know that if you include a fixed
> quadratic effect of predictor A, then you typically should include the
> lower order fixed linear effect of A as well.
> Does an analogous rule apply to random effects? I think that it may
> make theoretical sense to include only a random quadratic effect,
> without the corresponding random linear effect. Can anyone tell me
> whether or not this would be "kosher?"

That obviously depends on your argument. As long as your can give a
reasonable argument for your choices everything is allowed. However,
what you propose is unusual, so you'd better have a good argument
because when you try to publish this someone is guaranteed to ask you
about it. Moreover, I find it hard to imagine an argument that could
support such a model, so I suspect that there is an error in your
argument. But this is just a guess based on very limited information.
This is all we can say, since you did not give us your argument.

-- Maarten

Maarten L. Buis
Reichpietschufer 50
10785 Berlin
*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index