Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: Exact Matching


From   "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   RE: st: Exact Matching
Date   Wed, 10 Apr 2013 07:19:50 -0700 (PDT)

Hi.
check mahapick from SSC. Use the -matchon- option.
HTH
--david
Sent with Verizon Mobile Email


---Original Message---
From: [email protected]
Sent: 4/10/2013 8:58 am
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: Exact Matching

Dear Statalist members,

I am trying to run a coarsened exact matching to create comparable pair of individuals within my sample. 
In summary, I need to match an employees that leaves a firm with another employees within the same firm on several characteristics. So, the treatment is leaving the firm or not (0 or 1).

I am trying to performe the matching in the following way:

cem firm_id(#0) experience(#5) salary(#5), treatment(leave)

I am trying to first coarse the matching only within the individuals that belong to the same firm (have the same firm_id). However, After the matching I observe that although most of the control group that was generated (matched) belongs to the same firm, some observations do not. 

Would someone have a suggestion on how I could set the program to first perform an exact matching on firm_id and then match on the addition characteristics?

Best,

Alexander 		 	   		  
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   !
 http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index