Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Richard Williams <richardwilliams.ndu@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu, statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: indicator variable and interaction term different signs but both significant |
Date | Sat, 06 Apr 2013 19:01:24 -0400 |
http://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam/xsoc63993/l53.pdffor a discussion of how to interpret main effects when a model has interaction terms and ways to make results more interpretable. In your case you might want to center MV (i.e. subtract the mean from each case) and possibly other independent variables. Or, try drawing some graphs. Or, just don't worry about it too much. Once you add an interaction term, the interpretation of the effect of OC_D is very different.
Finally, as a sidelight, I would recommend using factor variable notation if you are using Stata 12, because this will let you use the margins and marginsplot commands. The above handout shows some examples.
At 04:45 PM 4/6/2013, Nahla Betelmal wrote:
Dear Statalist, I am having difficulty interpreting the results from OSL regression. I am trying to see whether Overconfident managers manipulate earnings in a certain context. The dependent variable earnings_Mgt is continuous The problem is that the indicator variable for overconfidence (OC_D) is negative and significant, while the interaction between the indicator variable and market_value variable (OC_MV) is positive and significant. What does that mean? Does it mean that overconfident managers manipulate earnings less than others (rational managers), but when the market value is high they manipulate earnings more than rational managers do? Your help is highly appreciated, many thanks Nahla Betelmal Linear regression Number of obs = 56 F( 8, 47) = 3.60 Prob > F = 0.0025 R-squared = 0.3719 Root MSE = .08355 Robustearnings Mgt Coef. Std. Err. t P>t [95% Conf. Interval] size .0058268 .0092169 0.63 0.530 -.0127153 .0243689 leverage .0924198 .0724032 1.28 0.208 -.0532367 .2380763 MV .0046896 .0032752 1.43 0.159 -.0018993 .0112784 litigation .0310148 .0267527 1.16 0.252 -.0228048 .0848344 private_D -.0638102 .023056 -2.77 0.008 -.110193 -.0174275 same_D -.08197 .0273465 -3.00 0.004 -.136984 -.026956 OC_D -.0730767 .0288269 -2.54 0.015 -.131069 -.0150844OC_MV .0105348 .0049493 2.13 0.039 .000578 .0204916_cons .0381444 .0615391 0.62 0.538 -.0856564 .1619452* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
------------------------------------------- Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463 HOME: (574)289-5227 EMAIL: Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/