Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Stata 13 hope


From   Ronan Conroy <rconroy@rcsi.ie>
To   "<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   Re: st: Stata 13 hope
Date   Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:03:56 +0000

It seems like a logical direction. Latent class analysis would be welcome here also. 

r

On 2013 Ean 28, at 17:36, Alan Acock wrote:

> Stata 12's sem command is very promising. Given Stata's strength with categorical and count variables, I would assume these are going to be added for 13--At least I hope so. In additon to this, I would like to see latent class analysis and mixture models added. I'm sure these would be complicated additions but combined with adding categorical and count outcome variables, this would make Stata's sem command highly competitive with specialized programs like Mplus.

Ronán Conroy
rconroy@rcsi.ie
Associate Professor
Division of Population Health Sciences
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Beaux Lane House
Dublin 2


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index