Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
David Ashcraft <ashcraftd@rocketmail.com> |

To |
"statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
Re: st: Nonlinear regression syntax |

Date |
Sat, 19 Jan 2013 07:18:20 -0800 (PST) |

Thanks Nick, when I said constant in the previous e-mail, I meant that the value of gamma and ci is fixed. however, both are defined as variables. I have generated both variables by following: Woodward, G., & Anderson, H. M. (2009). Does beta react to market conditions? Estimates of “bull” and “bear” betas using a nonlinear market model with an endogenous threshold parameter. Quantitative Finance, 9(8), 913–924. doi:10.1080/14697680802595643 In short gamma, ci, rg and moveave are variables. Complete algebraic expression that I want to solve is {rg*(1+exp(-gamma*(moveave-ci)))^-1} where rg is multiplied with the inverse of the expression within parenthesis. I want to estimate three parameters: rg, algebraic expression and gfc if I don't use -nl- what would be the alternatives? Regards David ----- Original Message ----- From: Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Cc: Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 4:19:16 PM Subject: Re: st: Nonlinear regression syntax You have {rg*(1+exp(-gamma*(moveave-ci)))^-1} That will make no sense to -nl-. The most basic syntax for braces { } is that braces must enclose parameter names only. There are other possibilities but they do not cover your syntax. {rg}*(1+exp(-gamma*(moveave-ci)))^-1 would make sense if and only if the names gamma moveave ci are names of variables (or possibly names of known scalars). You need to tell us what your model is, distinguishing variables, known scalars if any and parameters to be estimated. Nick On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:39 PM, David Ashcraft <ashcraftd@rocketmail.com> wrote: > rg, algebraic expression and gfc are parameters to be estimated and that's why I used braces {}. gamma and ci are constants. in the first line: rg and moveave are variables where moveave is the quarterly moving average of rg. > > You mentioned that a brace is omitted. I do not see the omitted brace. Can you please point out the missing brace in the following? > > nl (rx={rg}+{rg*(1+exp(-gamma*(moveave-ci)))^-1}+{gfc}) Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> > Did you type _exactly_ the first line? If "rg" is a parameter to be > estimated, then a brace "}" has been omitted. Is "gamma" really a > variable as implied by your syntax? > > In general, there seems confusion here over algebraic conventions and > Stata rules. In algebra you can use braces { } using similar rules to > parentheses () and brackets []: i.e. they are all delimiters and must > just match and nest logically. But in -nl- expressions braces {} have > a special meaning to indicate parameters to be estimated and makes no > sense otherwise. > > Nick > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:12 AM, David Ashcraft > <ashcraftd@rocketmail.com> wrote: >> I want to run the following model as a non-linear regression: >> >> nl (rx={rg}+{rg*(1+exp(-gamma*(moveave-ci)))^-1}+{gfc}) >> >> where rx is dependent variable. when I run this model Stata gives the error code: r(480); starting values invalid or some RHS variables have missing values >> >> >> As a second option, I solved the non-linear function outside the equation by having a new variable fm={rg*(1+exp(-gamma*(moveave-ci)))^-1} and run again: >> >> nl (rx={rg}+{fm}+{gfc}) >> >> Now I get the results with omitted values for fm. >> >> I don't know where is my mistake. Any help will be greatly appreciated. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Nonlinear regression syntax***From:*Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: Nonlinear regression syntax***From:*David Ashcraft <ashcraftd@rocketmail.com>

**Re: st: Nonlinear regression syntax***From:*Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Nonlinear regression syntax***From:*David Ashcraft <ashcraftd@rocketmail.com>

**Re: st: Nonlinear regression syntax***From:*Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Strange Behaviour When Selecting Levels For Factor Variables In Regression With i#** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: xtnbreg - robusteness check and model relevance** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Nonlinear regression syntax** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Nonlinear regression syntax** - Index(es):