Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
David Hoaglin <dchoaglin@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Strange Behaviour When Selecting Levels For Factor Variables In Regression With i# |

Date |
Sat, 19 Jan 2013 08:59:07 -0500 |

Sarah, Richard's output clarifies a lot! It may not make my earlier explanation clearer, but it's useful to review the interpretation of an estimated coefficient in a multiple regression. Consider the coefficient of patient in these models. It summarizes change in bp per unit change in patient after adjusting for simultaneous change in sex, when, and when*patient. Each of the three models makes the same adjustment for the contribution of sex, but the third model shares that adjustment differently between the predictor for sex (i0.sex instead of i1.sex) and the constant term. The interpretation above differs from the common, but oversimplified, interpretation that talks about holding the other predictors constant. These models show why one should avoid the "held constant" interpretation: It's not possible to change patient and hold when*patient constant. David Hoaglin On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 1:12 AM, Sarah Elizabeth Edgington <sedging@ucla.edu> wrote: > I share Daniel's confusion and this explanation doesn't make it any clearer > to me. > If sex were not a binary variable then the other coefficients changing would > make sense because the different regressions would actually be changing how > sex is coded. However, with a variable that's coded 0/1 to begin with, > isn't i.sex the equivalent of i1.sex? That is, isn't an indicator for when > sex=1 exactly the same variable as the original sex variable? In which case > you'd expect the first two regression examples to be exactly the same. The > fact that they aren't suggests to me that there's something I don't > understand about the i1.sex factor variable syntax. What am I missing? > > -Sarah * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: Strange Behaviour When Selecting Levels For Factor Variables In Regression With i#***From:*daniel56061-stata@yahoo.de

**Re: st: Strange Behaviour When Selecting Levels For Factor Variables In Regression With i#***From:*David Hoaglin <dchoaglin@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Strange Behaviour When Selecting Levels For Factor Variables In Regression With i#***From:*Sarah Elizabeth Edgington <sedging@ucla.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Nonlinear regression syntax** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Nonlinear regression syntax** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Strange Behaviour When Selecting Levels For Factor Variables In Regression With i#** - Next by thread:
**st: Cut-off point for ROC curve using parametric and non-parametric method** - Index(es):