Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: ST: More decimal places in P-Values for regression coefficients following mi estimate


From   Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: ST: More decimal places in P-Values for regression coefficients following mi estimate
Date   Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:19:11 +0000

See

http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?set+cformat

Nick

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Andrew Stoddart
<andrew.stoddart@ed.ac.uk> wrote:

> Does anyone know how I can get stata to display p-values on regression
> coefficients to 4 decimal places (or indeed more) rather than the default 3
> within statas multiple imputation suite mi estimate command?
>
> For example outside of the mi suite I would perhaps use:
>
> reg y1 x1 x2 x3
> est tab, p(%10.4g)
>
> however unfortunately the est tab post estimation command doesn't appear to
> work within statas mi suite, ie:
>
> mi estimate: reg y1 x1 x2 x3
> est tab, p(%10.4g)
>
> returns the error:
>
> current estimation results do not have e(b) and e(V) r(321);
>
>
> Presumably this is because the mi suites equivalent to e(b) and e(V) are
> e(b_mi) and e(V_mi) and the est tab command doesn't pick these up.
> however I am unaware of a means to get the est tab command to use these
> alternative matrices.
>
> Does anyone know of way around this or perhaps an alternative command which
> does a similar thing?
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index