Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | W Robert Long <W.R.Long@leeds.ac.uk> |
To | "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | st: Model identification in Stata sem() |
Date | Fri, 07 Dec 2012 18:06:36 +0000 |
Hi StatalistIn "An Overview of Stata’s “sem” for Structural Equation Modeling" by Bollen and Bauldry (2012) the authors state that a limitation of sem() is in detecting under-identified models, giving an example of a two-indicator CFA with simulated data which is not identified, but Stata gives no warning about that. The document can be downloaded here:
http://www.cpc.unc.edu/training/seminars/BollenBauldry%20SEM%20JAN13.pdfYet, here ( http://www.stata.com/capabilities/structural-equation-modeling/ ) it states that models are checked for identification.
Could anyone clarify ?FWIW I don't have Stata 12 (yet) so I can't check it for myself at the moment.
Thanks ! RL * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/