Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | "Dimitriy V. Masterov" <dvmaster@gmail.com> |
To | Statalist <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | Re: st: marginal after biprobit |
Date | Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:03:12 -0800 |
Ayman, biprobit is the right command. Austin Nichols has instructions on calculating the AME here: www.stata.com/meeting/chicago11/materials/chi11_nichols.pdf. There are several ways of doing it, some are better than others, but they tend to produce similar results. DVM On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Ayman Farahat <ayman.farahat@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hello ; > I am working on a problem where the dependent variable (iscloed) is binary and one of the regressors (isgroupon) is binary and endogenous. > Based on advice i got from the statalist, it was suggested to use a biprobit, > I ended up using something of the form > > biprobit (isclosed = myfailpricerisk lreviewnumber isgroupon) (isgroupon = mygrouponziprisk mygrouponpricerisk lbrate) > > > A couple of questions : > 1) Is the biprobit the correct command? > 2) how do i get the marginal effect of "isgroupon" on "iscolosed" ? > Thanks > Ayman > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/