Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Full references are expected [was: Re: st: QUAIDS with demographic translation]

From   Nick Cox <>
Subject   Full references are expected [was: Re: st: QUAIDS with demographic translation]
Date   Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:24:12 +0100

This is a reminder that we expect full references. The advice at

has recently been revised to make this even more explicit:

Precise literature references please! Please do not assume that the
literature familiar to you is familiar to all members of Statalist. Do
not refer to publications with just minimal details (for example,
author and date). Questions like “Has anyone implemented the
heteroscedasticity under a full moon test of Sue, Grabbit, and Runne
(1989)?” admittedly divide the world. Anyone who has not heard of the
said test would not be helped by the full reference to answer the
question, but he or she might well appreciate the full reference.
References should be in a form that you would expect in an academic
publication or technical document. For example, include full author
name, date, paper title, journal title, and volume and page numbers in
the case of a journal article.

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Khalida Akhtar Choudhury
<> wrote:
> Hello,
> I have tried to code my own do file for QUAIDS with demographic
> translation. I am using the approach of Gould & Dong (2004). There are
> two differences between my approach and that of Banks et al. (1997).
> There is a scalar term representing demographic variables(ti(d)) in
> the welfare share equation(wi) and the expenditure m* is now dependent
> on demographic variables.

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index