Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
robert hartman <rohartman@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
st: Doing something an observation-specific number of times |

Date |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:45:49 -0400 |

Hi Listers, Imagine that observation 1 has v1 and v2 values of .41 and 78, respectively. There are many other observations like this, where v1 values lie on the unit interval and v2 values are positive integers (let's say the upper bounded is 600). I want to create a new variable and store in it the results of an algebraic equation that uses the v1 and v2 values from same row, as well as some constants, and where "observation-specific exponentiation" is happening. For example, let's say I want to add a constant to v1 raised to some power and then divide that by some other constant. And let's say that the "some power" is every power from 1 to the v2 value inclusive (e.g., 1 through 78 in this case, 1 through 2 if the v2 value is 2...) and then sum up those terms. For example, for observation 1, the new obs 1 v3 value=((1+(.41^1))/2) + ((1+(.41^2))/2) ...((1+(.41^77))/2) + ((1+(.41^78))/2). The specific use case is convoluted, and I don't think in-depth understanding of it is critical to the programming (we'll see). I have begun to think of some klugy ways of doing this via looping or even the expand command. However, whereas my Stata programming skills are mediocre and have been acquired ad hoc, I thought some of you might have some insights as to a relatively computationally efficient and/or lines-of-code efficient way of doing this kind of thing. There may even be some kind of obvious (to you, not me) algebraic workaround that I'm not catching. Thanks, Rob * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Doing something an observation-specific number of times***From:*Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Doing something an observation-specific number of times***From:*Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Creating new variables for parent groups in a joint family** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Creating new variables for parent groups in a joint family** - Previous by thread:
**st: Creating new variables for parent groups in a joint family** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Doing something an observation-specific number of times** - Index(es):