Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Bonferroni-holm
From
"Lachenbruch, Peter" <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: Bonferroni-holm
Date
Sun, 19 Aug 2012 07:07:58 -0700
Read the literature on multiple comparisons! Books have been available for over 20 years
Sent from my iPhone
Tony Lachenbruch
On Aug 19, 2012, at 6:39 AM, "Sadjad Riahi" <[email protected]> wrote:
> dear statalist,
> I have found In a paper with the similar methodology with ours that
> for correction of multiple comparisons, authors have applied
> bonferroni-holm correction. To explain the analysis in short, they
> have several dependent variable (subcorticalgray matter region
> volumes) and three groups of diagnosis, intracranial volumes,age and
> sex as predictor variables.they have fitted a GLM for each region
> volume as the dependant variable seperately, then F test was preformed
> and subsequently contrast analysis. but for multiple comparison they
> first corrected for the omnibus test and then correction for pairwise
> comparison for each GLM that survived the first round of correction
> was performed. Can you please enlighten me with this correction
> procedure more in detail.
>
> yours,
>
> Sadjjad Riahi
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/