Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: sampling weight


From   "Md. Alauddin Majumder" <[email protected]>
To   "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject   RE: st: sampling weight
Date   Sat, 18 Aug 2012 19:03:39 +0000

Thanks Anees for the link!

Alauddin


________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Muhammad Anees [[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 1:59 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: sampling weight

Following this discussion and having a look of the contents of the
links, the BLS provides you creating a customized weight for your
research. Have a Look of

http://www.bls.gov/nls/nlsy97.htm

for

NLSY97 Data and Documentation at NLSinfo.org

and check the following options under the above Heading and which is

>>>>>>> Customized sampling weights to properly represent the population groups your research is examining

I hope that may help you.

--

Best
---------------------------
Muhammad Anees
Assistant Professor/Programme Coordinator
COMSATS Institute of Information Technology
Attock 43600, Pakistan
http://www.aneconomist.com



On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Md. Alauddin Majumder
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Steve, thanks for your suggestion!
>
> Alauddin
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Steve Samuels [[email protected]]
> Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 1:26 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: st: sampling weight
>
>>
>> On Aug 18, 2012, at 7:55 AM, Md. Alauddin Majumder wrote:
>>
>> Hello statalist, I am confused about which sampling weight (panel or cross sectional) to use, while the sample is a pooled sample from the NLSY97.
>>
>>
>
> I have no experience with this survey, but after looking at
> http://www.nlsinfo.org/nlsy97/nlsdocs/nlsy97/use97data/weights.html,
> I think that one likely answer to your question is "neither weight".
>
>
> I suggest that you consult someone who has done an analysis of the NLSY97
> similar to that which you propose.
>
>
> Steve
> [email protected]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index