Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: Quadratic Function, Turning Points and Interaktion Terms


From   Lukas Borkowski <LukasBork@hotmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   st: Quadratic Function, Turning Points and Interaktion Terms
Date   Tue, 8 May 2012 21:54:02 +0200

Dear all,

I work on a model that can be simplified as y = a_x1 b_x2 c_x3
My first findings suggest that the effects of x1-3 on y will change with increases in x1-3. Now, do I have to run 
reg y x1 x1sq
di _b[x1]/(2*_b[x1sq])*-1
for every x seperately or combined, thus
reg y x1 x1sq x2 x2sq x3 x3sq
in order to find the correct turning points? 

What happens when I add interaction terms, lets say for g1 and g2 for groups. 
Should I run the regression over my unrestricted equation including all interaction terms?

So my questions are: Do I check for the turning points of different variables at once or seperately and do I include my interactions terms?

Thanks for your help!

Regards,
Lukas
#
Lukas Borkowski




*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index