Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Testing the validity of instruments when estimating a GMM model with Windmeijer corrected standard errors
From 
 
Natalie Trapp <[email protected]> 
To 
 
[email protected] 
Subject 
 
st: Testing the validity of instruments when estimating a GMM model with Windmeijer corrected standard errors 
Date 
 
Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:14:28 +0100 
Hi,
I estimate a GMM model with Windmeijer corrected robust standard errors 
as follows
xtdpd y l3.y_rain x1 x2 x3 x4 x5, dgmmiv(l3.y_rain, lag(2 3))  dgmmiv(x1 
x2 x3, lag(2) ) lgmmiv(x1 x2 x3,lag(2)) div(x4 x5 ) twostep hascons 
vce(robust)
When using the vce(vcetype) option, the sargan statistic cannot be 
obtained because the distribution of the Sargan test is unknown when the 
disturbances are heteroscedastic. However, I need to test the validity 
of over-identifying restrictions and was thinking whether one can use 
the same model without a Windmeijer correction (without vce(robust)) to 
test for the validity of over-identifying restrictions and then infer on 
the robust model?
Thank you,
Natalie
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/