Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: Inverse Cummulative Variable
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: Inverse Cummulative Variable
Date
Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:32:48 +0000
That's clearly right in principle. In practice, -cumul- is I think easier for what was asked for here.
Nick
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Hoaglin
For the number of firms that have at least as many employees (rather
than the percentage of firms), it should be possible to work with
ranks.
David Hoaglin
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> Survivor, survival or reliability function I have often seen for the
> complementary probability. Is it used also for the corresponding
> complementary frequency, which is being sought here?
>
> Nick
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/