Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Francesco <cariboupad@gmx.fr> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | st: why Margins gives "not estimable" ? |
Date | Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:06:49 +0100 |
Dear Statalist, I have a simple, yet puzzling question (at least for me) about -margins. I run a fixed effect regression and I would like to understand the effect of a dummy variable (DUM) interacted with a categorical variable (CAT) CAT can take 5 values (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) lets say. When I run -xtreg Y 1b.CAT##DUM, vce(cluster id) I get the results and if I type -margins CAT, dydx(DUM) I get by how much I increase the predicted values of the output Y when DUM=1 and according to the values of CAT. So far, so good. However, if in the original regression I include another categorical variable : CAT2 (7 possible values) -xtreg Y 1b.CAT##DUM i.CAT2, vce(cluster id) then -margins CAT, dydx(DUM) or -margins CAT, dydx(DUM) at(CAT2="a particular value of CAT2) or even -margins CAT, dydx(DUM) over(CAT2) they all return "not estimable"... Do you have an idea ? I am probably missing some important option or syntax in the margins command ? Many thanks * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/