Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: pooled regression vs fixed effects

From   Sami Alameen <>
Subject   Re: st: pooled regression vs fixed effects
Date   Tue, 7 Feb 2012 20:42:52 +0200

I wonder shouldn't -areg- and -xtreg- give the same results:

use grunfeld
areg invest kstock mvalue, absorb(company)
xtreg invest kstock mvalue, fe

or with time dummies

xi: areg invest kstock mvalue i.year, absorb(company)
xi: xtreg invest kstock mvalue i.year, fe

I could be wrong, but what I remember from and old FAQ that the two
commands only differ in R2 calculation.
*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index