Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
| From | khigbee@stata.com |
| To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
| Subject | Re: RE: st: repeated measures ANOVA to MANOVA - revisit |
| Date | Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:44:40 -0600 |
Ricardo Ovaldia <ovaldia@yahoo.com> is concerned by a statement by Alan Feiveson <alan.h.feiveson@nasa.gov> concerning ANOVA. > I checked the UCLA page suggested and I did not find anything > regarding repeated measures ANOVA or MANOVA. I am now very > concerned about your statement that you "... have abandoned > Stata's implementation(s) of repeated measures ANOVA entirely, as > I am rarely able to get it to replicate what I know to be > accurate with other software". Is there something wrong with > Stata's ANOVA? Nothing is wrong with the answers from Stata's -anova-. Stata's -anova- (including the repeated measures part) has been thoroughly tested against several sources. I am guessing that Alan's complaint is that he finds it difficult to determine the correct specification of options in -anova- to do some repeated-measure ANOVAs. Ken Higbee <khigbee@stata.com> * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/