Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Cameron McIntosh <cnm100@hotmail.com> |

To |
STATA LIST <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
RE: st: Question on multiple equation regression with different types of DVs and NLCOM |

Date |
Mon, 2 Jan 2012 11:04:32 -0500 |

Will the total effect be meaningful without some kind of standardization of the constituent effect coefficients (linear + logit)? Anyway, you might want to track down the paper that goes with this abstract (one of the authors might be able to help you further): Coxe, S., & MacKinnon, D.P. (2010). Abstract: Mediation Analysis of Poisson Distributed Count Outcomes. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45(6), 1022. And in the event of an intractable analytical approach for getting the SEs, I might also suggest bootstrapping to get an empirical sampling distribution and compute SEs for the total and other effects: Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.http://www.comm.ohio-state.edu/ahayes/indirect2.pdfhttp://www.comm.ohio-state.edu/ahayes/SPSS%20programs/indirect.htm MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128. Fitrianto, A., & Midi, H. (2010). Estimating Bias and RMSE of Indirect Effects using Rescaled Residual Bootstrap in Mediation Analysis. WSEAS Transactions on Mathematics 6(9), 397-406.http://www.wseas.us/e-library/transactions/mathematics/2010/89-645.pdf Mallinckrodt, B., Abraham, W.T., Wei, M. & Russell, D.W. (2006). Advances in Testing the Statistical Significance of Mediation Effects. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(3), 372–378. http://www.psychology.iastate.edu/~wei/manuscript/mediation.pdf Cam > Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 10:16:59 -0500 > Subject: st: Question on multiple equation regression with different types of DVs and NLCOM > From: narasimhan.sowmyanarayanan@gmail.com > To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > > charecteristic > > I = exp (α+β_1 P+β_2 V+β_2 V*P) (1) > > Perf= δ+δ_1 *I + δ_2 P + δ_3 P*I + δ_4*V + δ_5*V*P (2) > > > I would like to get the total effect of "P" on perf (direct effect + > effect through I) and its standard error. Equation 1 is a count data > variable with poisson regression and equation 2 is a continuous > metric. > > I know the mean marginal for the total effect is: > > TEffect = (∂Perf(.))/∂P+(∂I(.))/∂P* (∂Perf(.))/∂I > > > I was wondering if there is any way to store these estimates and use > nlcom to get the standard errors through the built in delta method > routines in stata. Comments would be highly appreciated. > > Best. > > N > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Question on multiple equation regression with different types of DVs and NLCOM***From:*Narasimhan Sowmyanarayanan <narasimhan.sowmyanarayanan@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: Question on multiple equation regression with different types of DVs and NLCOM***From:*Narasimhan Sowmyanarayanan <narasimhan.sowmyanarayanan@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Re: metareg** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Question on multiple equation regression with different types of DVs and NLCOM** - Previous by thread:
**st: Question on multiple equation regression with different types of DVs and NLCOM** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Question on multiple equation regression with different types of DVs and NLCOM** - Index(es):