Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
| From | Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> |
| To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
| Subject | Re: st: descogini command |
| Date | Sun, 11 Dec 2011 16:42:34 +0000 |
The most up-to-date version of -descogini- appears to be that at SSC. Nick On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> wrote: > This can not be answered helpfully. On this information, it appears > that either you or -descogini- (SSC) is wrong. If I had to bet, I > would back -descogini- (SJ). > > That is, if you give us (a) example data that everyone can work with > (b) your code and your results (c) the precise -descogini- command > you used and the -descogini- results, then there is something that can > be discussed. > > Nick > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Jesus A Tirado Alcaraz > <atirado@utdallas.edu> wrote: > >> I am using the descogini command, which among other things computes the share of each income source in total income (Sk). However, when I compute this share by hand I get different results. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/