Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Applying specific aweight to each explanatory variable


From   Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Applying specific aweight to each explanatory variable
Date   Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:09:27 -0500

Steve--
But see answers the first time this question was asked e.g.
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2011-11/msg00551.html

On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Steven Samuels <sjsamuels@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Your request does not make sense.  Analytic weights are proportional to the the residual variance of the dependent variable for each observation. Their use minimizes the standard errors of the regression coefficients.  Please look at any regression text.
>
> Steve
> On Nov 12, 2011, at 10:01 AM, <N.M.Postel-Vinay@lse.ac.uk> <N.M.Postel-Vinay@lse.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm running simple cross-sectional regressions. I would like to know whether it is possible to make Stata apply a different aweight to each separate explanatory variable.
>
> Usually at the end of the regression I can just write [aweight = exp], but this would apply the same aweight to each explanatory variable. I would like to know whether it's possible to specify a different exp as an aweight for each different explanatory variable, and whether that would make any sense or not. My explanatory variables are financial ratios, so I would need a different weight for each different denominator.
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Natacha
>
>
>

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index