Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Switching regression on Panel data

From   Austin Nichols <>
Subject   Re: st: Switching regression on Panel data
Date   Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:01:14 -0400

Andrea Mannberg <>:
I doubt your application satisfies the assumptions maintained by
but see also

I cannot see how you ever hope to estimate the effect of gender while
"controlling for individual heterogeneity."

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Andrea Mannberg
<> wrote:
> Dear Statalisters,
> I am running a switching regression on a panel dataset.  If I understand it correctly, I cannot simply estimate the inversed mills ratio via xtprobit, insert this in the second step and bootstrap standard errors to correct for the generated regressor. Instead, I should estimate separate probits for each year and the corresponding imr. The second step is then to be estimated by fixed effects (Wooldridge, Journal of Econometrics, 68, 1995).
> I face two problems with this approach. First, my analysis is a program evaluation. Our basic hypothesis is that the program affects both the outcome in the first step (probit) and the outcome in the second step (continuous variable). Running separate probits for each time period  removes the possibility to control for individual heterogeneity (since I cannot control for both being in a treated household before treatment and being in a treated household after treatment). Second, since I am interested in the effect of for example gender, I cannot do fixed effects in the second step.
> To say the least, I am no expert on this issue, so I am not even sure that I have understood the basic procedure correctly. Any advice is highly appreciated.
> Best regards
> Andrea Mannberg

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index