Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: conception confusion - "fixed effects" and time effect on data with time factor |

Date |
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:35:50 +0200 |

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 7:58 PM, House Wang wrote: > In this study, I am interested in the random effects of the year > variable, which means the errors of D.V. due to year. > To measure the random effects of year variable, the correct Stata > command is to add i.year to the model, right? There is some inconsistent terminology in your question. I guess you want to do a regular regression (-regress-) and you want to know how much of the variance in your dependent/explained/outcome/y variable is explained by time. The correct parametrization of time depends on how you think time "works" in your problem. Time can have an effect on your outcome in the sense of aging or decay or it can be a proxy for everything that happened in a given year that in turn may have influenced your outcome variable. In the former case you'd probably want some kind (non-linear) trend, while in the latter case you probably want to add it as a categorical variable like you suggested. However, you would need to think really hard whether the variables you are by proxy controlling for are in fact intervening or confounding variables. In the former case you'll bias your results when you include time and in the latter case you'll bias your results when you don't include time. The problem is that probably some of the variables are intervening and others confounding. I that case the best, but probably unrealistic, solution is to directly measure the variables you want to control for rather than rely on a proxy. Hope this helps, Maarten -------------------------- Maarten L. Buis Institut fuer Soziologie Universitaet Tuebingen Wilhelmstrasse 36 72074 Tuebingen Germany http://www.maartenbuis.nl -------------------------- * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: conception confusion - "fixed effects" and time effect on data with time factor***From:*House Wang <jwanghouse@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: conception confusion - "fixed effects" and time effect on data with time factor***From:*House Wang <jwanghouse@gmail.com>

**Re: st: conception confusion - "fixed effects" and time effect on data with time factor***From:*Richard Williams <richardwilliams.ndu@gmail.com>

**Re: st: conception confusion - "fixed effects" and time effect on data with time factor***From:*House Wang <jwanghouse@gmail.com>

**Re: st: conception confusion - "fixed effects" and time effect on data with time factor***From:*Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com>

**Re: st: conception confusion - "fixed effects" and time effect on data with time factor***From:*House Wang <jwanghouse@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**RE: st: Autocorrelation and heteroscedasticity following xtreg** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: why does stata creates missing values when running zinb model** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: conception confusion - "fixed effects" and time effect on data with time factor** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: conception confusion - "fixed effects" and time effect on data with time factor** - Index(es):