Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | "Schaffer, Mark E" <M.E.Schaffer@hw.ac.uk> |
To | <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | st: RE: Cross-sectional dependence in fixed effects panel model |
Date | Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:37:08 +0100 |
Christina, Driscoll-Kraay SEs rely on large-T asymptotics. Your T is rather small - only 11 - and that suggests D-K SEs may not be the way to go. Daniel Hoechle's 2007 SJ paper (7:3) on xtscc has a nice and accessible discussion of D-K SEs and more. HTH, Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu > [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of > christina sakali > Sent: 14 September 2011 10:44 > To: statalist > Subject: st: Cross-sectional dependence in fixed effects panel model > > Dear Statalisters, > > I would like to estimate a fixed effects panel model with > possible cross-sectional dependence (contemporaneous > correlation). My sample consists of N=11, T=11. > > My question regards both the interpretation of the tests > contained in xtcsd and the estimation with Driscoll-Kraay > S.E. under xtscc: > > 1. First, I am not completely sure how I should interpret > results of the tests contained in xtcsd and xttest2, given > the fact that I got some conflicting results from these > tests, which are provided below. > My feeling is that I should trust the results of the Pesaran > test (as more appropriate for my sample), which indicates the > presence of cross-sectional dependence, but again I am a > little confused regarding the conflicting and inconclusive > results from the other tests. > > 2. Second, if my model does suffer from cross-sectional > dependence, I am wondering whether the Driscoll-Kraay S.E. > (xtscc) are appropriate for my case. De Hoyos and Sarafidis > (2006, p.1-2) clearly mention that if "cross-sectional > dependence is caused by the presence of common factors, which > are unobserved ... but uncorrelated with the included > regressors, ... one may chose to rely on standard FE/RE > methods and correct the SE by following the approach proposed > by Driskoll and Kraay (1998). On the other hand, if the > unobserved components that create interdependencies across > cross-sections are correlated with the included regressors, > these approaches will not work and the FE and RE estimators > will be biased and inconsistent. In this case, one may follow > the approach proposed by Pesaran (2006). > > Based on the above, I would like to ask if there is a way to > find out which of the two cases mentioned by De Hoyos and > Sarafidis (2006) is relevent for my model and what other > alternatives I 've got in Stata, in order to produce robust > S.E. in presence of contemporaneous correlation, apart from > the Driskoll and Kraay S.E. > > In case this is relevant to the above, the residuals in my > model seem to be heteroscedastic but not serially correlated > (after checking the stats in xttest 3 and xtregar ..., fe lbi) > > I am using Stata 9.2 at home but I could possibly have access > to some newer version of Stata at faculty. > > > Results from xtcsd and xttest2 are provided below: > > qui xtreg fdi gg rulc trade tert sec eu, fe > > . xtcsd, pesaran abs > > Pesaran's test of cross sectional independence = 2.899, > Pr = 0.0037 > > Average absolute value of the off-diagonal elements = 0.302 > > . xtcsd, friedman > > Friedman's test of cross sectional independence = 17.537, > Pr = 0.0633 > > . xtcsd, frees > > Frees' test of cross sectional independence = 0.244 > |--------------------------------------------------------| > Critical values from Frees' Q distribution > alpha = 0.10 : 0.2333 > alpha = 0.05 : 0.3103 > alpha = 0.01 : 0.4649 > > . xttest2 > > Breusch-Pagan LM test of independence: chi2(55) = 79.711, > Pr = 0.0164 > Based on 11 complete observations over panel units > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > -- Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity registered under charity number SC000278. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/