Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Arka Roy Chaudhuri <gabuisi@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: IV estimation in a negative binomial framework |
Date | Fri, 12 Aug 2011 13:31:40 -0700 |
Thank so much for your suggestions. Abhimanyu, please correct me if I am wrong but the -ssm- procedure does not seem to allow for negative binomial in its family sub command- it only allows for binomial and poisson. I had a question about -ivpois- vs -qvf-.Is there any reason for -ivpois- to be theoretically better than -qvf-? I looked at the example in the ivpois help file which shows that ivpois performs better than qvf but in my case qvf seems to perform better than ivpois. So I was wondering if there are any theoretical reasons for why ivpois is better than qvf and the essential differences between the two. Thanks a lot again for all your suggestions. Regards, Arka On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com> wrote: > > Arka Roy Chaudhuri <gabuisi@gmail.com> > -glm- with a log link does not need an assumption that the conditional > variance is equal to the conditional mean to be consistent, nor does > its IV analog. See -ivpois- on SSC and > http://www.stata.com/meeting/boston10/boston10_nichols.pdf > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Arka Roy Chaudhuri <gabuisi@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > I am analyzing a model where my dependent variable is a count > > variable, specifically the number of riot cases in a district. Since > > the variance of the dependent variable is quite high compared to the > > mean I plan to use the negative binomial distribution. However my > > independent variable is endogenous and I would like to use a > > instrument variable analysis. Unfortunately I have been unsuccessful > > in finding any program which implements IV in a negative binomial > > context. Could somebody please advice me how to implement IV > > estimation in a negative binomial framework? I would really appreciate > > any help in this regard. > > > > Thanks, > > Arka > > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/