Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: No valid instruments for system GMM

From   [email protected]
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: No valid instruments for system GMM
Date   Mon, 01 Aug 2011 13:58:36 +0200

Hi Natalie,

have you checked the difference GMM estimator (Arelano-Bond)? It might be that the Hanson test fails because the additional moment restrictions used by the system estimator are rejected.


-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 13:24:48 +0200 (CEST)
> Von: [email protected]
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: st: No valid instruments for system GMM

> Dear statalist,
> I would like to estimate an agricultural production function using panel
> data of approximately 20,000 individuals over 20 years. Applying system GMM
> - due to unobserved heterogeneity and simultaneity (inputs and output are
> determined together e.g. due to profit-maximizing behaviour of the firm), I
> estimate the following:
>      xtabond2 y l.y x1 x2 x3 x4 x5, robust gmm(y x4 x5) iv(x1 x2 x3)
> small noconst
> where y is output (crop yields), x1-x3 (e.g. weather) are strictly
> exogenous input variables and x4-x5 are endogenous variables (e.g. fertilisers).
> Furthermore, I added a lagged dependent variable on the right-hand side as
> it is highly significant. This specification passes the autocorrelation
> tests, but not the Sargan test of valid instruments. If I, however, specify
> using lag (18 19) (the maximum nr. of lags possible for my dataset) it passes
> the Sargan test at the 5% level, but do not obtain any significant
> estimates, except for the lagged dependent variable:
>      xtabond2 y l.y x1 x2 x3 x4 x5, lag(18 19) robust gmm(y x4 x5)
> iv(x1 x2 x3) small noconst
> Is there any systematic way of finding valid instruments for the system
> GMM? Or is there another estimator that I can use to handle simultaneity
> where I don't need instruments from outside the dataset (I know there is one
> called "opreg" from Olley and Pakes, but I need to specifiy exit of a firm
> which is not included in my data).
> I would greatly appreciate any comments on this problem!
> Best regards,
> Natalie
> ___________________________________________________________
> Schon gehört? WEB.DE hat einen genialen Phishing-Filter in die
> Toolbar eingebaut!
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *
> *
> *

NEU: FreePhone - 0ct/min Handyspartarif mit Geld-zurück-Garantie!		
Jetzt informieren:
*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index