Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | "Wike, Traci" <twike@email.unc.edu> |
To | "statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | RE: st: flongsep and pooled estimates |
Date | Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:12:55 +0000 |
Is there any other way to pool estimates other than using mi estimate? ________________________________________ From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] on behalf of Joerg Luedicke [joerg.luedicke@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 12:59 AM To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: Re: st: flongsep and pooled estimates On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Wike, Traci <twike@email.unc.edu> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I am running an analysis on m=0 using the flongsep format for my imputed data--flongsep automatically updates the other imputed datasets based on m=0--does this mean that it pools estimates the same way the command mi estimate does? I am trying to work around mi estimate because it does not support a command I need. > If you run your analysis on m=0 then you do not use any imputed data. -flongsep- defines one of four ways to store/handle your multiply imputed data (-help mi set-). Specifically, when using the -flongsep- format, M+1 data files are stored separately. For example, if you impute 3 data sets (M=3) you save separate files for m=0, m=1, m=2, and m=3. For cases without imputed values m1=m2=m3=m0 because of the full long format. For cases with imputed data, the values vary across m1 to m3 and are missing in m0. In any case, this is not affecting the way estimates are combined after running an estimation command. J. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/