Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: RE: Panel data with small T(24) and N(14) - how to estimate?
From
Maria Plich <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: RE: Panel data with small T(24) and N(14) - how to estimate?
Date
Fri, 27 May 2011 19:54:41 +0200
Dear David.
I appreciate your help.
In Stata help I have read that using xtpcse one can assume only
panel-level heteroscedasticity (I understand heteroscedasticity
between groups). In my panel data there is also heteroscedasticty
within groups. How to deal with it?
Could you also explain me why xtgls is less proper than xtpcse?
In advance thank you very much for help.
Maria
2011/5/27 Maria Plich <[email protected]>:
> Dear David.
> I appreciate your help.
> In Stata help I have read that using xtpcse one can assume only
> panel-level heteroscedasticity (I understand heteroscedasticity between
> groups). In my panel data there is also heteroscedasticty within groups. How
> to deal with it?
> Could you also explain me why xtgls is less proper than xtpcse?
> In advance thank you very much for help.
> Maria
> 2011/5/27 Jacobs, David <[email protected]>
>>
>> I suspect the Stata procedure named -xtpcse- would be more appropriate.
>> Some political scientists have claimed that -xtgls- standard errors are too
>> small. The -xtpcse- procedure does everything that -xtgls- does, so why not
>> use that procedure?
>>
>> Dave Jacobs
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Maria Plich
>> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 7:17 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: st: Panel data with small T(24) and N(14) - how to estimate?
>>
>> Dear Statausers,
>>
>> I am creating model based on panel data which has got relatively small
>> N (14) and T (24). What is important N represents whole population. I
>> expect problems with heteroscedasticity within and between panels as
>> well as cross-sectional and serial correlation. I wonder if use of
>> generalized least squares (xtgls) to estimate relations between data
>> is a good idea. If not, could you suggest me something better?
>>
>> In advance thank you very much for help.
>>
>> Maria
>>
>> *
>> * For searches and help try:
>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>
>> *
>> * For searches and help try:
>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/