Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: what does "no overidentifiying restriction" result mean for estat overid?
From 
 
John Antonakis <[email protected]> 
To 
 
[email protected] 
Subject 
 
Re: st: what does "no overidentifiying restriction" result mean for estat overid? 
Date 
 
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:20:55 +0200 
Hi:
Is your model overidentified?  That is, do you have more instruments 
than endogenous regressors (mediators)?  You probably don't, which is 
what is causing the error (though your e-mail is very vague--avoid such 
vague requests in the future).  E.g., run
. webuse auto
. qui ivregress 2sls price (mpg = weight)
Now, typing:
. estat overid
Gives:
no overidentifying restrictions
r(498);
HTH,
J.
__________________________________________
Prof. John Antonakis
Faculty of Business and Economics
Department of Organizational Behavior
University of Lausanne
Internef #618
CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny
Switzerland
Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438
Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305
http://www.hec.unil.ch/people/jantonakis
Associate Editor
The Leadership Quarterly
__________________________________________
On 25.04.2011 05:55, yuanxi zhang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was doing instrumental variable regression on stata, and tried estat
> overid command to test whether the instrument is exogenous. However,
> the program shows "no overidentifying restriction", which looks like
> an error message to me. Does that mean we should reject the null or
> the other way around?
>
> Thank you very much!
>
> Brandon Zhang
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/