Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: svylogitgof: changes dramatically across models using the same pooled sample
From
Eileen Diaz McConnell <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: svylogitgof: changes dramatically across models using the same pooled sample
Date
Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:14:20 -0700
I'll look into estat gof as an option. Appreciate this advice!
-Eileen
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Williams
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 8:35 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: svylogitgof: changes dramatically across models using the same pooled sample
At 07:53 PM 4/12/2011, Steven Samuels wrote:
>Eileen, I assume that you're on Stata 11, since you don't say
>otherwise. -svylogitgof- doesn't work with subpop() options and has
>other problems in Stata 11.
>
>See: http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2011-03/msg00442.html
>
>Steve
>[email protected]
Last I remember seeing, getting -estat gof- to work with the subpop option was on the Stata development list:
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2011-03/msg00555.html
I wonder how terrible it would be if you used the -if- option instead of -subpop-? I know that is frowned upon, but if the alternative is to do nothing at all, which is better?
-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
HOME: (574)289-5227
EMAIL: [email protected]
WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/