Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Interaction terms
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Interaction terms
Date
Mon, 4 Apr 2011 08:17:27 +0100
This is the third time of asking. You asked this question twice
before, on March 30 and March 31.
The Statalist FAQ gives advice on this situation at
http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/statalist.html#noanswer
specifically advising at most once _one_ repost, and generally
advising that you rethink a question no one evidently wants to answer.
In this case, what you want evidently isn't clear. -mprobit- by itself
gives standard errors of terms fitted, interaction or plain.
Interpretation ultimately comes down to the science or substance of
your problem, and there isn't a program to help much with that.
(-inteff- and -clarify- are user-written programs whose sources you do
not explain.)
Nick
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:52 AM, josephine gakii <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am using multinomial probit with an interaction term in
> it. I would like to compute standard errors for meaningful
> interpretation of my results that have an interaction term.
>
> I have tried using the -inteff- command in STATA but it seems to support only the binary logit and probit. i have also tried the CLARIFY command in STATA but it does not support multinomial probit
>
> Is there a command that can handle interaction terms in multinomial probit?
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/