Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: DiD
From
[email protected]
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: DiD
Date
Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:51:26 +0200
So, you have this regression:
> regress y treat post05 treat_post05 [aweight=hhweight],r cluster(ea)
with a dataset like this:
> id year y program treat post05 treat_post05
1 2000 10 0 0 0 0
2 2000 20 0 0 0 0
3 2000 30 0 0 0 0
4 2000 40 0 1 0 0
5 2000 50 0 1 0 0
6 2000 60 0 1 0 0
1 2007 70 0 0 1 0
2 2007 80 0 0 1 0
3 2007 90 0 0 1 0
4 2007 100 1 1 1 1
5 2007 110 1 1 1 1
6 2007 120 1 1 1 1
7 2007 130 0 0 1 0
8 2007 140 0 0 1 0
9 2007 150 0 0 1 0
and treat*post05 is dropped?
I think you could try to see how things changes if you change the weights, or omit treat (or post05) or the clusters, and also see how much treat*post05 is correlated with treat and post05.
Federico
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/