Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: constrained regression but one constraint not being implemented
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: constrained regression but one constraint not being implemented
Date
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:20:25 +0000
It's at least a quirk that e.g. a reference to `i+1' is interpreted by
Stata as a reference to `i'. That is, the extra characters "+1" are
ignored, and do not trigger an error message. Note that `i1' is a
legal reference to a local macro of that name (and is interpreted as
empty if there is no such macro). It's the "+" that is, or should be,
problematic as such a character can not be part of a Stata name.
But Maarten pointed out, `i + 1' is not equivalent to `i' + 1. As you
want that, you must ask for it directly.
Nick
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Maarten buis <[email protected]> wrote:
> --- On Wed, 23/3/11, Steve Martin wrote:
>> Why does the following piece of code only impose the
>> second of the two constraints when estimating the
>> constrained regression
> <snip>
>> constraint `i+1' llonepenhx=1-`i'/10
>> cnsreg lallcancerssyllr68 $xvar [w=raw0607], constraints(`i'-`i+1')
>
> replace `i+1' with `= `i' +1'
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/