Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
| From | Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> |
| To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
| Subject | Re: st: RE: RE: discrepancy in the number of groups |
| Date | Thu, 3 Mar 2011 09:01:56 +0000 |
This is the third posting of this question. Please note advice in the FAQ about repeating questions at http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/statalist.html#noanswer which stipulates the protocol: At most one repeat. Unless someone else answers, the implication of silence is: Sorry, no idea, and please take this question elsewhere. Nick On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:55 AM, EUN BUM CHO <manoa.hawaii@gmail.com> wrote: > When I ran the two-level random intercept model (firms at level 2 and observations at level 1), firms (i.e., number of groups) were correctly counted as 369. > But when I ran the three-level random intercept model (industries at level 3, firms at level 2, and observations at level 1), firms (number of level groups) were counted as 370. > Both share the same sample and I really cannot sort it out why this discrepancy arises. > Any idea? > > [twice more] * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/