Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: Test fitness and Results explanation


From   momo <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   st: Test fitness and Results explanation
Date   Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:05:02 -0700 (PDT)

Hi all,

I do a bivariate probit regression, and to test heteroscedasticity I used
linear regression and got the next results, so what do you think for the
procedure first and the second for the results, meanwhile the second test
with low chi2 and the first is high. And what about the significant p value

the work is on stata

Breusch-Pagan / Cook-Weisberg test for heteroskedasticity 
Ho: Constant variance
Variables: fitted values of nore

chi2(1) = 5897.97
Prob > chi2 = 0.0000


Breusch-Pagan / Cook-Weisberg test for heteroskedasticity 
Ho: Constant variance
Variables: fitted values of expo

chi2(1) = 6.54
Prob > chi2 = 0.0106

thanks in advanced
-- 
View this message in context: http://statalist.1588530.n2.nabble.com/Test-fitness-and-Results-explanation-tp5666033p5666033.html
Sent from the Statalist mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index