R: st: generate

["Carlo Lazzaro" <carlo.lazzaro@tin.it>]

Mirriam wrote:
"I am referring to limit in terms of number of observations. I am using
stata version 9.2".

A look at -help limits- can give Mirriam the following # of observations
limits for different version of Stata 9.2:

Small: about 1,000;
Intercooled: 2,147,483,647  
Stata/MP and Stata/SE: 2,147,483,647

Despite the same # of observations limits, Stata/MP and Stata/SE can handle
a higher maximum number of variables (32,767) than Intercooled (2,047).

Kind Regards,
Carlo
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
[mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] Per conto di Mirriam Gee
Inviato: venerdì 8 ottobre 2010 9.53
A: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Oggetto: Re: st: generate

I am referring to limit in terms of number of observations. I am using
stata version 9.2.



On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Nick Cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> wrote:
> It's the same data, wide or long. Which limit, observations or variables,
do you imagine will bite first? Look at -help limits- for your version of
Stata (not stated here).
>
> Before you replied, I was going to reinforce Dimitriy's advice. I would
reach for -reshape- in this instance and I would keep the data in long form,
at least on the information you have given.
>
> In a concurrent thread, I have commented:
>
> Some things are easier with a  wide structure but most things are easier
otherwise.
>
> There is much more discussion in
>
> SJ-9-1  pr0046  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Speaking Stata:
Rowwise
>        (help rowsort, rowranks if installed) . . . . . . . . . . .  N. J.
Cox
>        Q1/09   SJ 9(1):137--157
>        shows how to exploit functions, egen functions, and Mata
>        for working rowwise; rowsort and rowranks are introduced
>
> Although that column shows that you can do many things rowwise, the
underlying theme is that it isn't usually trivial.
>
> Nick
> n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk
>
> Mirriam Gee
>
> Thank you very much Dimitry for your suggestion. It worked perfectly
> well but my main worry is I have many hid (30000) and many g
> variables( eventually i will work with over 2000 variables), so i will
> end up having memory limitation problems if I use reshape command.
> Unless of course if I also divide my dataset into smaller groups.
>
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Dimitriy V. Masterov
>
>> Mirriam Gee wants to:
>>> generate new variable(s) X1- X20 which contains the first 20
>>> numbers ( excluding the zeros) from g1- g100?. For example:
>>
>> There's probably a more elegant way of doing this, but this can be
>> accomplished with the -reshape- command to make your data easier to
>> work with, and then reshaping it again to get it like you want it for
>> your analysis. First, preserve the data and then reshape long to get
>> the X variable. Then, reshape wide and save the X variables. Restore
>> the G variables data, and merge the Xs back in with the Gs:
>>
>> #delimit;
>> /* Preserve your data */
>> preserve;
>>
>> /* Preserve your data */
>> preserve;
>>
>> /* Create the x variables with 2 reshapes */
>> keep hid g*;
>> reshape long g, i(hid) j(which_g);
>>
>> drop if g==0;
>> rename g x;
>> bys hid: gen t=_n;
>> drop which_g;
>>
>> reshape wide x, i(hid) j(t);
>>
>> tempfile temp;
>> save "`temp'";
>>
>> /* Restore data */
>> restore;
>>
>> /* Merge the x variables with the g variables */
>> merge 1:1 hid using "`temp'";
>> drop x21-_merge;
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/